Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.1, 4.0 | -- |
| 2012-07-10 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.26 x 2.75 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black and White |
| Kevlar | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1780mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 204 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a lot better than Motorola ATRIX HD, having an 82.5 score against 63.5. Even though Google Pixel 2 XL is heavier than Motorola ATRIX HD, it's a bit thinner and a lot newer. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a better hardware performance than Motorola ATRIX HD, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a sharper display than Motorola ATRIX HD, because it has a really larger screen, a much better pixel amount per inch of screen and a way higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. Google Pixel 2 XL takes much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola ATRIX HD, because it has a lot higher (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola ATRIX HD, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola ATRIX HD, because it has a 98 percent bigger battery size.
The Google Pixel 2 XL costs a bit more than the Motorola ATRIX HD, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.