Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.1, 4.0 | -- |
| 2012-07-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.26 x 2.75 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Kevlar | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1780mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 204 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is much better than Motorola ATRIX HD, having an 80 score against 63.5. Google Pixel 3's construction is way newer and just a little bit thinner, but a little bit heavier than Motorola ATRIX HD. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola ATRIX HD, because it has a greater display density, a larger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Motorola ATRIX HD, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and more processing cores. The Google Pixel 3 has a greater camera than Motorola ATRIX HD, because it has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much better (4K) video quality.
Google Pixel 3 features a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola ATRIX HD, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 3 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola ATRIX HD, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 costs a bit more money than the Motorola ATRIX HD, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.