Search


Compare phones

Global Score
35.338.7
Basic Information
MotorolaBlackberry
--BlackBerry 5.0.x
2008-10-212010-09-14
3.81 x 1.87 x 0.73 inches4.29 x 2.36 x 0.55 inches
4.97 ounces3.70 ounces
$ 2269.00$ 190.00
Display / Screen
1.6 inches2.4 inches
--320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
LCDTFT
115 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.65.9
processor processor
--512 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.85
Storage
2 GB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
1.91.32
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
4.734.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.32.5
Battery Life
810mAh Li-Ion Battery1150mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
400 hours standby time
7.3 hours talk time
252 hours standby time
4.5 hours talk time
2.242.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS

Comparison review

The BlackBerry Curve 3G 9330 is a bit better than Motorola AURA, with a 38.7 score against 35.3. BlackBerry Curve 3G 9330 is a newer cellphone, and it is also incredibly lighter and way thinner than the Motorola AURA. BlackBerry Curve 3G 9330 has a slightly better looking display than Motorola AURA, because it has a way larger screen and a higher screen pixel density.

BlackBerry Curve 3G 9330 features a little bit better processing power than Motorola AURA. Both have 0 processing cores. The Motorola AURA has a superior storage for games and applications than BlackBerry Curve 3G 9330, although it has no slot for external memory cards. Motorola AURA and BlackBerry Curve 3G 9330 both feature quite similar cameras, both of them have a same resolution back-facing camera.

BlackBerry Curve 3G 9330 has a very superior battery life than Motorola AURA, because it has a 1150mAh battery size instead of 810mAh.

Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the BlackBerry Curve 3G 9330 is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.