Search


Compare phones

Global Score
35.338.7
Basic Information
MotorolaLG
2008-10-212008-10-13
3.81 x 1.87 x 0.73 inches4.11 x 2.13 x 0.66 inches
4.97 ounces4.59 ounces
$ 2269.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
1.6 inches3 inches
--240 x 400 pixels
LCDTFT
115 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive
5.65.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
2 GB internal memory61,44 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
1.90.5
Camera
2.00 MP5.00 MP
--720 x 480 video resolution
4.735.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.33.3
Battery Life
810mAh Li-Ion Battery950mAh Li-Polymer Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
400 hours standby time
7.3 hours talk time
400 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
2.242.48
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR
--Accelerometer
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The LG PRADA II has a score of 38.7, which is a bit better than the Motorola AURA's general score of 35.3. LG PRADA II's design is a bit thinner and a bit lighter than Motorola AURA, even when they were released with only 0 months difference. LG PRADA II features a bit better looking display than Motorola AURA, because it has a much larger screen and a greater pixel number in each screen inch.

Motorola AURA counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than LG PRADA II, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 2 GB internal storage. The Motorola AURA and the LG PRADA II count with really similar CPUs, both have a 0-Core CPU. The LG PRADA II counts with improved battery lifetime than Motorola AURA, because it has 950mAh of battery capacity against 810mAh.

The LG PRADA II features a much better camera than Motorola AURA, because it has a much more MP back camera.

LG PRADA II is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.