Search


Compare phones

Global Score
35.333.2
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
2008-10-212006-09-04
3.81 x 1.87 x 0.73 inches4.21 x 1.77 x 0.64 inches
4.97 ounces4.90 ounces
$ 2269.00$ 2200.00
Display / Screen
1.6 inches--
--208 x 208 pixels
LCDTFT
115 pixels per inch163 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.66
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
2 GB internal memory131,07 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotNo SD card slot
1.90.6
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
4.734.73
EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.3
Battery Life
810mAh Li-Ion Battery700mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
400 hours standby time
7.3 hours talk time
240 hours standby time
2.8 hours talk time
2.242.08
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.0
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Motorola AURA has a global score of 35.3, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition's 33.2 general score. The Motorola AURA body is much newer, but somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier than Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition. Motorola AURA and Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition have really similar processors, they have a 0-Core CPU.

The Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition features a little sharper display than Motorola AURA, because it has a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen. The Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition and Motorola AURA count with really similar cameras, they have the same resolution camera. Motorola AURA features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition, because it has 1,87 GB more internal memory.

The Motorola AURA counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition, because it has an 810mAh battery capacity against 700mAh.

The Motorola AURA is a bit more expensive than Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.