Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 2.2, 2.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2010-10-05 | 2019-05-07 |
| 4.31 x 2.48 x 0.52 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 265 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP3630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX530 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 7.29 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 238 hours standby time 6.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a general score of 78.9, which is a lot better than Motorola Bravo's 49.6 general score. The Google Pixel 3a XL design is much newer and extremely thinner, but much heavier than the Motorola Bravo. These phones use Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a XL has a more recent 11 version while Motorola Bravo has Android 2.2 version.
Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Bravo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and 3,5 GB more RAM. The Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Bravo, because it has a much better pixels density, a lot better 1080 x 2160 resolution and a much bigger display.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a much better camera than Motorola Bravo, because it has a lot more megapixels back camera. Google Pixel 3a XL has a superior memory for games and applications than Motorola Bravo, although it has no slot for external memory cards. Google Pixel 3a XL features a much better battery life than Motorola Bravo, because it has a 140 percent larger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a XL is a bit more expensive than the Motorola Bravo, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.