Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.2, 2.1 | -- |
| 2010-10-05 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.31 x 2.48 x 0.52 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 265 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP3630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX530 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.29 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 238 hours standby time 6.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is much better than the Motorola Bravo, with an 83.3 score against 49.6. Galaxy S9 is a newer and a lot thinner cellphone than the Motorola Bravo, although it's also heavier. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a better looking display than Motorola Bravo, because it has a lot larger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and much more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S9 features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Bravo, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 400 GB. Galaxy S9 has a much greater performance than Motorola Bravo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
The Galaxy S9 features a superior battery life than Motorola Bravo, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S9 features a greater camera than Motorola Bravo, because it has a much higher 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy S9 is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola Bravo.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.