Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.637.5
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
2011-01-312013-10-22
3.92 x 2.09 x 1.02 inches4.04 x 2.38 x 0.45 inches
5.60 ounces3.57 ounces
--Black, Blue, Green, Red, White and Yellow
$ 120.00$ 95.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2.8 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTLCD
128 pixels per inch143 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive
5.55.8
processor processor
--64 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
184,32 MB internal memory--
microSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
1.461.32
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
--35.00mm focal length
--0.2 inches (1/5") sensor
352 x 288 video resolution320 x 240 (13 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
4.735.72
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--EDGE, GPRS and GSM
--Micro SIM, Dual SIM
02.8
Battery Life
1750mAh Li-Ion Battery1200mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
150 hours standby time
5.8 hours talk time
528 hours standby time
14 hours talk time
3.62.88
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 3.0
GPS--
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Nokia Asha 500 is slightly better than Motorola Brute i686, having a score of 37.5 against 34.6. Nokia Asha 500's construction is notably newer, much thinner and notably lighter than the Motorola Brute i686. The Nokia Asha 500 and Motorola Brute i686 have quite similar CPUs, they have 0 processing cores.

The Nokia Asha 500 features a little sharper display than Motorola Brute i686, because it has a bigger display, a higher resolution of 320 x 240 and a little bit better display pixel density. The Motorola Brute i686 counts with more storage capacity for applications and games than Nokia Asha 500, although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 8 GB against 32 GB.

The Nokia Asha 500 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Brute i686. They have the same video definition, the same video frame rates and a back camera with a 2 MP. Motorola Brute i686 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Nokia Asha 500, because it has a 46 percent greater battery size.

Nokia Asha 500 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making buying this phone an easy decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.