Compare phones
Nokia 1661
1661, 1662| Global Score | |
| 28.7 | 27.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-11-04 |
| 4.09 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches | 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches |
| 2.51 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| 101 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.2 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 340 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time | 500 hours standby time 3.9 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.32 |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola C168 is a little bit better than Nokia 1661, with a 28.7 score against 27.3. The Motorola C168 construction is a little bit thicker but lighter than the Nokia 1661. Nokia 1661 has a processing unit that is very similar to the CPU in Motorola C168, both of them have a 0-Core CPU. Nokia 1661 features a slightly better display than Motorola C168, because it has a quite better resolution of 160 x 128px and a little bit higher count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Nokia 1661 and Motorola C168 both count with very similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos. The Motorola C168 features longer battery life than Nokia 1661, because it has a 1000mAh battery capacity against 860mAh. Nokia 1661 and Motorola C168 feature incredibly similar cameras.
Motorola C168 and the Nokia 1661 cost exactly the same, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.