Search


Compare phones

Global Score
28.748.9
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
--Symbian Belle
--2011-08-24
4.09 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches4.37 x 2.09 x 0.56 inches
2.51 ounces3.53 ounces
--Black, Green, Pink and White
$ 40.00$ 40.00
Display / Screen
--3.2 inches
128 x 128 pixels 360 x 640 pixels
STNTFT
101 pixels per inch229 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.27.5
processorARM11 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor
--512 MB RAM
GPUYes GPU
5.767.38
Storage
--2 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
03.22
Camera
--5.00 MP
--1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution
06.27
Networks
--Wi-Fi
GPRS and GSMHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
0.23.3
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery1200mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
340 hours standby time
8.3 hours talk time
540 hours standby time
15 hours talk time
2.562.88
Other Features
--Bluetooth 3.0
--GPS
--NFC
--Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Nokia 600 is much better than the Motorola C168, having a 48.9 score against 28.7. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, the Nokia 600 construction is much heavier and a little bit thicker than Motorola C168. The Nokia 600 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola C168, because it has a larger number of cores.

The Nokia 600 counts with a way better screen than Motorola C168, because it has a way higher pixel density and a much higher resolution of 640 x 360. The Nokia 600 has a lot better camera than Motorola C168. Nokia 600 features a superior memory for games and applications than Motorola C168, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 32 GB.

Nokia 600 counts with greater battery performance than Motorola C168, because it has a 20 percent bigger battery size.

Nokia 600 and the Motorola C168 cost the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.