Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.7 | 26.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.1 |
| -- | 2006-09-12 |
| 4.09 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches | 4.60 x 2.74 x 0.55 inches |
| 2.51 ounces | 5.10 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 39.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| STN | TFT |
| 101 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.2 | 3.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 81,92 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | miniSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.5 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 340 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time | 336 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Motorola C168 has a general score of 28.7, which is a little bit better than the Nokia E62's 26.2 general score. Motorola C168's body has the same thickness than the Nokia E62, but it's a lot lighter. Nokia E62 counts with a CPU that is very similar to Motorola C168's processor, they have a 0-Core processor.
Motorola C168 counts with a lot better display than Nokia E62, although it has a way worse resolution of 128 x 128. The Nokia E62 and Motorola C168 both have quite similar cameras. Nokia E62 has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Motorola C168. The Nokia E62 has a way better battery performance than Motorola C168, because it has a 50% bigger battery size.
Motorola C168 is a bit more expensive than Nokia E62, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.