Compare phones
Samsung Entro
SPH-M270| Global Score | |
| 28.7 | 30.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | 2012-08-03 |
| 4.09 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches | 3.77 x 1.88 x 0.75 inches |
| 2.51 ounces | 3.50 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.7 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | -- |
| STN | -- |
| 101 pixels per inch | 235 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.2 | 6.1 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | -- |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 340 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time | 480 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 1.36 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Samsung Entro is a bit better than Motorola C168, having a general score of 30.1 against 28.7. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, Samsung Entro is a extremely heavier and extremely thicker cellphone than the Motorola C168. Samsung Entro features a much better looking screen than Motorola C168, because it has a much better display density.
The Samsung Entro features a CPU that's just as good as the CPU in Motorola C168, both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Entro and Motorola C168 feature similar memory to install applications and games. The Samsung Entro and Motorola C168 have incredibly similar cameras. The Motorola C168 has a superior battery duration than Samsung Entro.
The Samsung Entro and the Motorola C168 cost exactly the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.