Search


Compare phones

Global Score
28.752.2
Basic Information
MotorolaZTE
--Android 6.0 Marshmallow
--2016-07-16
4.09 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches5.73 x 2.87 x 0.43 inches
2.51 ounces5.29 ounces
--Blue
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 40.00$ 40.00
Display / Screen
--5 inches
128 x 128 pixels 854 x 480 pixels
STN--
101 pixels per inch196 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.26.4
Performance
--Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset
processorARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor
--1 GB RAM
GPUAdreno 304 GPU
5.768.01
Storage
--8 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot
05.06
Camera
--5.00 MP + 2.00 MP
--1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution
06.05
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
GPRS and GSMLTE (4G) and HSPA
SIM--
0.26
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery2300mAh Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
340 hours standby time
8.3 hours talk time
--
2.564.24
Other Features
--Bluetooth 4.1
--GPS
--Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The ZTE Sonata 3 is way better than Motorola C168, with a overall score of 52.2 against 28.7. The ZTE Sonata 3 is a way thinner but extremely heavier cellphone than Motorola C168. ZTE Sonata 3 counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola C168, because it has more cpu cores. The ZTE Sonata 3 features an incredibly better display than Motorola C168, because it has a lot higher display pixel density and a much higher 480 x 854 resolution.

The ZTE Sonata 3 features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola C168, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 64 GB. ZTE Sonata 3 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola C168. The ZTE Sonata 3 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola C168, because it has a 2300mAh battery capacity.

The ZTE Sonata 3 costs exactly the same than the Motorola C168.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.