Compare phones
Nokia 1661
1661, 1662| Global Score | |
| 28.7 | 27.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-11-04 |
| 4.09 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches | 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches |
| 2.51 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| 101 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.2 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 340 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time | 500 hours standby time 3.9 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.32 |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola C168i has an overall score of 28.7, which is a bit better than the Nokia 1661's general score of 27.3. The Motorola C168i is a lighter but just a little thicker device than the Nokia 1661. The Nokia 1661 has a bit more vivid display than Motorola C168i, because it has a bit higher 160 x 128 resolution and a bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Nokia 1661 has as much storage capacity for applications and games as the Motorola C168i one. Nokia 1661 and Motorola C168i both feature very similar processing units, they have the same number of cores. Nokia 1661 and Motorola C168i both count with very similar cameras. The Motorola C168i features superior battery life than Nokia 1661, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity against 860mAh.
The Motorola C168i and the Nokia 1661 cost the same, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.