Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.7 | 26.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.1 |
| -- | 2006-09-12 |
| 4.09 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches | 4.60 x 2.74 x 0.55 inches |
| 2.51 ounces | 5.10 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 39.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| STN | TFT |
| 101 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.2 | 3.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 81,92 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | miniSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.5 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 340 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time | 336 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Motorola C168i is a little bit better than Nokia E62, with a 28.7 score against 26.2. Motorola C168i is a lighter phone than the Nokia E62, but both of them are 0.55inches thick. Motorola C168i and Nokia E62 feature really similar processing units, both of them have a 0-Core processor. The Motorola C168i counts with an incredibly better display than Nokia E62, although it has a much lower 128 x 128 resolution.
Nokia E62 features a way bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola C168i. The Nokia E62's camera is just as good as the Motorola C168i one. Nokia E62 has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola C168i, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola C168i costs a bit more money than the Nokia E62, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.