Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 24.2 | 25.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| 2006-04-03 | 2007-05-03 |
| 3.43 x 1.91 x 0.93 inches | 4.01 x 1.73 x 0.68 inches |
| 3.50 ounces | 2.71 ounces |
| $ 200.00 | $ 80.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 98 x 68 pixels |
| STN | STN |
| -- | 43 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 4.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 4,1 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| CDMA | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 700mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 168 hours standby time 3.4 hours talk time | 365 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.08 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 1208 is a bit better than Motorola C290, getting a score of 25.5 against 24.2. The Nokia 1208 construction is newer, extremely thinner and notably lighter than Motorola C290. The Nokia 1208 counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola C290, although it has a lot lower 68 x 98 resolution.
Nokia 1208 features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola C290. Motorola C290 and Nokia 1208 have very similar CPUs, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit. The Nokia 1208 counts with a camera that's very similar to Motorola C290's camera. The Nokia 1208 features a much better battery duration than Motorola C290.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Nokia 1208 is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.