Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 23.8 | 32.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | 2006-04-05 |
| 4.20 x 1.90 x 0.90 inches | 3.36 x 1.89 x 0.90 inches |
| 3.50 ounces | 3.27 ounces |
| $ 35.00 | $ 35.00 |
| 96 x 64 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| -- | 165 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| -- | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 165 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.56 |
Comparison review
LG CG225 is a lot better than the Motorola C331t, getting a 32.2 score against 23.8. The LG CG225 design has the same thickness than Motorola C331t, but it's just a little lighter. LG CG225 counts with a processing unit that's very similar to the Motorola C331t one, both have a 0-Core processing unit.
The LG CG225 has a way better looking display than Motorola C331t, because it has a way higher resolution of 128 x 128. LG CG225 features a very superior camera than Motorola C331t. The LG CG225 and Motorola C331t count with incredibly similar memory for apps and games. LG CG225 counts with a way better battery performance than Motorola C331t.
The LG CG225 costs the same than the Motorola C331t, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.