Search


Compare phones

Global Score
23.841.9
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
--Symbian 9.3
--2009-02-10
4.20 x 1.90 x 0.90 inches4.41 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches
3.50 ounces2.93 ounces
$ 35.00$ 35.00
Display / Screen
--2.2 inches
96 x 64 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
--TFT
--182 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
2.86.5
processorARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.75
Storage
--61,44 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
01.5
Camera
--3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
05.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
03.5
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery860mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
165 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
400 hours standby time
7 hours talk time
1.362.32
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR

Comparison review

The Nokia 5630 XpressMusic is a lot better than the Motorola C331t, with a score of 41.9 against 23.8. Nokia 5630 XpressMusic's design is somewhat lighter and a lot thinner than Motorola C331t. The Nokia 5630 XpressMusic has a way better looking display than Motorola C331t, because it has a much better resolution of 320 x 240 pixels.

The Nokia 5630 XpressMusic counts with a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola C331t, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 16 GB. Nokia 5630 XpressMusic has a quite better performance than Motorola C331t, because it has a larger number of faster cores. The Nokia 5630 XpressMusic features a way better battery performance than Motorola C331t.

Nokia 5630 XpressMusic features a much better camera than Motorola C331t.

Nokia 5630 XpressMusic and the Motorola C331t cost exactly the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.