Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.8 | 35.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.2 |
| -- | 2006-11-28 |
| 4.20 x 1.90 x 0.90 inches | 3.70 x 1.96 x 0.82 inches |
| 3.50 ounces | 4.05 ounces |
| $ 35.00 | $ 35.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.2 inches |
| 96 x 64 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| -- | TFT |
| -- | 182 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 6.5 |
| processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor |
| -- | 64 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 51,2 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 2.00 MP |
| 0 | 4.73 |
| -- | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 950mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 165 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 264 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6290 is much better than Motorola C331t, getting a 35.1 score against 23.8. The Nokia 6290 design is just a bit thinner but somewhat heavier than Motorola C331t. Nokia 6290 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola C331t, because it has 1 more CPU cores. The Nokia 6290 counts with a lot better display than Motorola C331t, because it has a much better 320 x 240 resolution.
The Nokia 6290 shoots way better photos and videos than Motorola C331t. The Nokia 6290 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola C331t. Nokia 6290 counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola C331t.
The Nokia 6290 costs exactly the same than the Motorola C331t.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.