Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 24 | 32.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | 2006-04-05 |
| 4.20 x 1.80 x 0.90 inches | 3.36 x 1.89 x 0.90 inches |
| 3.90 ounces | 3.27 ounces |
| $ 35.00 | $ 35.00 |
| 96 x 64 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| -- | 165 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 3.6 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.56 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
The LG CG225 has a general score of 32.2, which is much better than Motorola C333 (CDMA)'s general score of 24. LG CG225 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than Motorola C333 (CDMA), but both are equally thin. LG CG225 features a much sharper screen than Motorola C333 (CDMA), because it has a lot higher resolution of 128 x 128.
The LG CG225 has as much storage to store more games and applications as the Motorola C333 (CDMA) one. The LG CG225 has a processing unit that is just as good as the Motorola C333 (CDMA) one, they have a 0-Core CPU. The LG CG225 has a much better battery duration than Motorola C333 (CDMA). The LG CG225 captures greater photos and videos than Motorola C333 (CDMA).
The LG CG225 and the Motorola C333 (CDMA) cost the same, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.