Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24 | 35.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.2 |
| -- | 2006-11-28 |
| 4.20 x 1.80 x 0.90 inches | 3.70 x 1.96 x 0.82 inches |
| 3.90 ounces | 4.05 ounces |
| $ 35.00 | $ 35.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.2 inches |
| 96 x 64 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| -- | TFT |
| -- | 182 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 6.5 |
| processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor |
| -- | 64 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 51,2 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 2.00 MP |
| 0 | 4.73 |
| CDMA | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 950mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 3.6 hours talk time | 264 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
Nokia 6290 is much better than Motorola C333 (CDMA), having a score of 35.1 against 24. The Nokia 6290 body is a bit heavier but a little bit thinner than Motorola C333 (CDMA). The Nokia 6290 has a little faster processor than Motorola C333 (CDMA), because it has more cpu cores. The Nokia 6290 counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola C333 (CDMA), because it has a lot better resolution of 320 x 240.
The Nokia 6290 captures way better photographs and videos than Motorola C333 (CDMA). Nokia 6290 has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola C333 (CDMA). The Nokia 6290 counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola C333 (CDMA).
Nokia 6290 and the Motorola C333 (CDMA) cost exactly the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.