Compare phones
HTC Ozone
XV6175| Global Score | |
| 24.8 | 42.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| -- | Windows Mobile Standard 6.1 |
| -- | 2009-06-25 |
| 3.90 x 1.70 x 0.75 inches | 4.50 x 2.50 x 0.50 inches |
| 2.98 ounces | 3.70 ounces |
| $ 70.00 | $ 70.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.4 inches |
| 96 x 65 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| STN | TFT |
| -- | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 6 |
| processor | Single-Core 528 MHz processor |
| -- | 192 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.66 |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 2.00 MP |
| 0 | 4.73 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| GPRS and GSM | EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 2.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | 324 hours standby time 4.8 hours talk time |
| 1.92 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The HTC Ozone is way better than the Motorola C350, getting a 42.3 score against 24.8. The HTC Ozone is a somewhat heavier but noticeably thinner cellphone than Motorola C350. The HTC Ozone has a lot better display than Motorola C350, because it has a much better 240 x 320 pixels resolution. HTC Ozone features a better processing power than Motorola C350, because it has more CPU cores.
HTC Ozone's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the Motorola C350 one. The HTC Ozone captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola C350. The HTC Ozone features a way better battery duration than Motorola C350, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity.
The HTC Ozone and the Motorola C350 cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.