Search


Compare phones

Global Score
24.843.5
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
--2012-02-27
3.90 x 1.70 x 0.75 inches4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches
2.98 ounces3.74 ounces
--Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
96 x 65 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
STNTFT
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
2.86.2
processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.767.29
Storage
--102,4 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.92
Camera
--3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
05.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
GPRS and GSMHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
0.23.6
Battery Life
600mAh Li-Ion Battery1430mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
4.5 hours talk time
707 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
1.923.2
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1, EDR

Comparison review

The Nokia Asha 302 is way better than the Motorola C350, with a overall score of 43.5 against 24.8. The Nokia Asha 302 construction is heavier but way thinner than the Motorola C350. Nokia Asha 302 has a lot better looking display than Motorola C350, because it has a way better resolution of 240 x 320px.

Nokia Asha 302 counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than Motorola C350, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 32 GB. The Nokia Asha 302 features a lot better processing power than Motorola C350, because it has 1 more cpu cores. Nokia Asha 302 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola C350.

The Nokia Asha 302 counts with a very superior battery performance than Motorola C350, because it has 1430mAh of battery capacity instead of 600mAh.

Nokia Asha 302 costs the same than the Motorola C350.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.