Search


Compare phones

Global Score
24.841.9
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
--Symbian 9.2
--2008-06-16
3.90 x 1.70 x 0.75 inches4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches
2.98 ounces4.47 ounces
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
96 x 65 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
STNTFT
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
2.86.4
processorARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.3
Storage
--112,64 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slot
01.36
Camera
--3.20 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
--640 x 480 (22 fps) (VGA) video resolution
06.38
Networks
--Wi-Fi
GPRS and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.23.3
Battery Life
600mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Polymer Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
4.5 hours talk time
312 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
1.923.28
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
--Infra-red port

Comparison review

The Nokia E71x has a global score of 41.9, which is way better than Motorola C350's 24.8 global score. The Nokia E71x body is incredibly heavier but thinner than Motorola C350. The Nokia E71x features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola C350, because it has a higher number of faster cores.

Nokia E71x features a way better display than Motorola C350, because it has a way better 240 x 320 resolution. Nokia E71x shoots greater videos and photos than Motorola C350. The Nokia E71x counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola C350, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 8 GB.

The Nokia E71x features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola C350, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity.

Nokia E71x and the Motorola C350 cost the same, making it easy to pick between these devices.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.