Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.4 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-06-03 |
| 4.21 x 1.73 x 0.82 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 3.20 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 139.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 96 x 68 pixels |
| STN | -- |
| -- | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 275 hours standby time 5.8 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 1.92 | 2.4 |
Comparison review
Nokia 1600 has an overall score of 26, which is a little bit better than the Motorola C390's 24.4 overall score. The Nokia 1600 design is thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola C390. Nokia 1600 has a processor that's very similar to Motorola C390's processing unit, they have the same number of cores.
The Nokia 1600 has a lot better display than Motorola C390, although it has a way lower 68 x 96px resolution. The Nokia 1600 and Motorola C390 both feature very similar cameras. The Nokia 1600 counts with as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Motorola C390.
The Nokia 1600 counts with a much better battery duration than Motorola C390, because it has a 900mAh battery size instead of 600mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Nokia 1600 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.