Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.4 | 31.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | 2005-11-08 |
| 4.00 x 1.70 x 0.80 inches | 3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches |
| 3.23 ounces | 3.49 ounces |
| $ 199.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 176 x 220 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 1,84 MB internal memory | 30,72 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 1.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 4.51 |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 740mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 215 hours standby time 6.3 hours talk time | 215 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time |
| 1.92 | 2.16 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
Motorola RAZR V3c is just a bit better than the Motorola C650, with a score of 31.2 against 28.4. The Motorola RAZR V3c design is a little bit heavier but way thinner than the Motorola C650. Motorola RAZR V3c has a screen that's very similar to the Motorola C650 one, although the Motorola RAZR V3c also has a much higher 220 x 176px resolution.
The Motorola RAZR V3c features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola C650, because it has 30,72 MB internal storage. The Motorola RAZR V3c's processor is just as good as the CPU in Motorola C650, they have 0 cores. Motorola RAZR V3c features superior battery performance than Motorola C650, because it has a 740mAh battery capacity against 600mAh.
Motorola RAZR V3c shoots a lot better photos and videos than Motorola C650, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola RAZR V3c is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.