Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.4 | 31.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-04-02 |
| 4.00 x 1.70 x 0.80 inches | 4.25 x 1.80 x 0.60 inches |
| 3.23 ounces | 2.60 ounces |
| $ 199.00 | $ 150.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| -- | 102 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 1,84 MB internal memory | 32,77 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 700mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 215 hours standby time 6.3 hours talk time | 424 hours standby time 7.6 hours talk time |
| 1.92 | 2.08 |
Comparison review
Nokia 1680 classic has a global score of 31.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola C650's 28.4 overall score. Nokia 1680 classic's construction is lighter and noticeably thinner than the Motorola C650. The Nokia 1680 classic has a much better screen than Motorola C650, because it has a slightly better 160 x 128 resolution.
The Motorola C650 and the Nokia 1680 classic both count with similar CPUs, both of them have 0 CPU cores. Nokia 1680 classic counts with a camera that's just as good as the Motorola C650 one, both of them have a camera in the back with a 0.3 mega pixels resolution. Nokia 1680 classic features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola C650, because it has 32,77 MB internal storage capacity.
The Nokia 1680 classic features a bit longer battery life than Motorola C650, because it has 700mAh of battery capacity instead of 600mAh.
The Nokia 1680 classic is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.