Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.8 | 31.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-11-04 |
| 4.45 x 1.97 x 0.83 inches | 4.21 x 1.81 x 0.54 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 3.17 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 2,05 MB internal memory | 32,77 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| -- | 128 x 96 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 3.63 | 3.74 |
| UMTS, GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 930mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 150 hours standby time 2 hours talk time | 540 hours standby time 4.8 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.64 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 2330 classic is much better than the Motorola C975, getting a general score of 31.8 against 28.8. The Nokia 2330 classic is a notably thinner and lighter device than the Motorola C975. The Nokia 2330 classic's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in Motorola C975, both have the same number of cores.
The Nokia 2330 classic features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola C975, although it has a lot worse 160 x 128 resolution. Nokia 2330 classic features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola C975, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 32,77 MB internal memory capacity.
Nokia 2330 classic counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola C975. Both have a same resolution camera. The Nokia 2330 classic counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola C975, because it has a 1020mAh battery capacity instead of 930mAh.
The Nokia 2330 classic and the Motorola C975 cost exactly the same, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.