Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45.6 | 50 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Kyocera |
| Android 1.5 | -- |
| 2009-09-10 | 2017-09-01 |
| 4.49 x 2.28 x 0.62 inches | 4.19 x 2.08 x 0.76 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 4.70 ounces |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 239.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 2.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | LCD |
| 186 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm MSM7200A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset |
| Single-Core 528 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 6.66 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 262,14 MB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.8 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 320 x 240 (25 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | -- |
| 5.83 | 4.73 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G) |
| SIM | -- |
| 3.3 | 5.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1420mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1430mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 324 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | -- |
Comparison review
The Kyocera Cadence LTE has a score of 50, which is slightly better than Motorola CLIQ's overall score of 45.6. The Kyocera Cadence LTE is a a lot newer and lighter phone than Motorola CLIQ, although it is also thicker. The Motorola CLIQ features just a bit better looking screen than Kyocera Cadence LTE, because it has a much higher 480 x 320 resolution, a bigger display and a quite better pixel density.
The Kyocera Cadence LTE features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola CLIQ, because it has 15,74 GB more internal memory. The Kyocera Cadence LTE counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola CLIQ, because it has 3 more processing cores and more RAM memory.
Motorola CLIQ shoots much better photographs and videos than Kyocera Cadence LTE, because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera. Kyocera Cadence LTE's battery performance is just as good as the Motorola CLIQ one, although the Kyocera Cadence LTE also has a 1% greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Kyocera Cadence LTE is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.