Compare phones
Motorola CLIQ
MB200Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 45.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 1.5 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2009-09-10 | 2013-09-04 |
| 4.49 x 2.28 x 0.62 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 239.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 186 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm MSM7200A chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Single-Core 528 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.66 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 262,14 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.8 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (25 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.3 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1420mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 324 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.2 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is much better than the Motorola CLIQ, having an 80.7 score against 45.6. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has the newer 5.0 version while Motorola CLIQ has Android 1.5 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and better performance. Even though Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit heavier than the Motorola CLIQ, it's a lot thinner and noticeably newer.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much sharper display than Motorola CLIQ, because it has a way higher 1920 x 1080px resolution, a lot larger screen and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola CLIQ, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with an extremely better processing unit than Motorola CLIQ, because it has 2,75 GB more RAM memory, a graphics processing unit and a greater number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a lot better camera than Motorola CLIQ, because it has a lot better video quality and a camera with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy Note 3 has a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola CLIQ, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 1420mAh.
Galaxy Note 3 is a little more expensive than the Motorola CLIQ, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.