Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-06-17 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than the Motorola Defy (2021), with a score of 87.1 against 77.2. The LG Velvet is an older device than Motorola Defy (2021), but LG managed to build it notably lighter and a lot thinner. The LG Velvet has a bit superior CPU than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG Velvet counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a way higher 1080 x 2460 resolution, a bit bigger display and a higher display pixel density. The LG Velvet counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video and a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the LG Velvet also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The LG Velvet has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage. Motorola Defy (2021) counts with longer battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.