Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-06-17 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the Motorola Defy (2021), having an 83.8 score against 77.2. Galaxy A50 is an incredibly older phone than the Motorola Defy (2021), but Samsung managed to build it incredibly lighter and thinner. The Galaxy A50 has a sharper screen than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little better processing power than Motorola Defy (2021). They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. The Motorola Defy (2021) shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality photographs and videos and better video frame rate.
Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has 64 GB more internal storage. Motorola Defy (2021) has improved battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.