Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-17 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Motorola Defy (2021), with a 92.9 score against 77.2. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is an older cellphone than Motorola Defy (2021), but it's thinner and lighter anyway. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version while Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a little bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit better camera than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same sensor size, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Defy (2021) counts with a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.