Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-17 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Motorola Defy (2021), getting a overall score of 97.6 against 77.2. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11 version, providing you some additional features and a performance increase. The Galaxy Fold is an older and somewhat heavier phone than Motorola Defy (2021), but Samsung made it notably thinner anyway.
Galaxy Fold features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a brighter display than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a little bigger display, a much better 1536 x 2152 resolution and a better display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Defy (2021) counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% more battery capacity.
Motorola Defy (2021) shoots clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Defy (2021) also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.