Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-06-17 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Motorola Defy (2021), with a general score of 90.8 against 77.2. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is an older phone than Motorola Defy (2021), but Samsung could make it much thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a sharper display than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a quite larger screen, a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a higher display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola Defy (2021) takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger diafragm aperture and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
The Motorola Defy (2021) counts with a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola Defy (2021) features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.