Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-17 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Motorola Defy (2021)'s global score of 77.2. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11, so it gives a couple nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older device than the Motorola Defy (2021), but it's thinner and lighter anyway.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a little better processing power than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much sharper display than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a quite bigger display, a lot better pixels count per display inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera, a way bigger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Motorola Defy (2021) has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.