Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-06-17 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than the Motorola Defy (2021), with a overall score of 81.2 against 77.2. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 construction is extremely thinner and extremely lighter than the Motorola Defy (2021), even though it was released many years before.
Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better processing power than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has lesser cpu cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Galaxy Note 3 has a lot better looking screen than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Defy (2021) has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Defy (2021) counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56 percent bigger battery size.
The Motorola Defy (2021) captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has a lot larger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs, a back camera with a lot better resolution, better video frame rates and a lot bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.