Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-06-17 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is slightly better than Motorola Defy (2021), having a global score of 80.4 against 77.2. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's design is much lighter and notably thinner than the Motorola Defy (2021), although it was released 4 years before. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much better screen than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a much better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Defy (2021). Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. Motorola Defy (2021) features a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Defy (2021) captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has a back camera with way more mega pixels, a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and higher video frame rate.
The Motorola Defy (2021) features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.