Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-17 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Motorola Defy (2021), getting a global score of 98 against 77.2. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is older than the Motorola Defy (2021), it's design is thinner and just a little bit lighter. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11, so it gives you some additional features.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a way higher screen pixel density, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a little bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better camera than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited situations and a smaller back-facing camera sensor offering a worse image quality, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera and a much better video quality.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery life is just as good as Motorola Defy (2021)'s battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.