Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-06-17 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is way better than the Motorola Defy (2021)'s 77.2 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11, providing some extra features and performance improvements. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a just a little lighter and somewhat thinner phone than Motorola Defy (2021), even though both of them were released with only a few months difference.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a lot greater pixel quantity per inch of display and a little bit larger display. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots way better photographs and videos than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and video in low light environments, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos, a much better resolution camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Motorola Defy (2021) has a better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery performance in Motorola Defy (2021).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.