Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-06-17 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than Motorola Defy (2021), getting an 80.1 score against 77.2. These devices use Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11 version. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is older, thicker and a little heavier than the Motorola Defy (2021).
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Defy (2021). Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a much higher pixels amount per inch in the display and a way higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Defy (2021) counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Defy (2021) also counts with a way bigger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and a camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as the Motorola Defy (2021), both have equal internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Defy (2021) has just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.