Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-17 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than Motorola Defy (2021)'s score of 77.2. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Galaxy XCover Pro design is a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Motorola Defy (2021), despite of the fact that it was released around 17 months before.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher screen pixels density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Motorola Defy (2021) and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro both have really similar storage to install applications and games, both have an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and the same 64 GB internal storage.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Defy (2021). They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores. Motorola Defy (2021) counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and a same size aperture, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has a much better resolution back camera, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a way larger sensor capturing much higher quality pictures.
The Motorola Defy (2021) has better battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.