Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-17 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Motorola Defy (2021), getting an 88.5 score against 77.2. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is older than the Motorola Defy (2021), it's design is way thinner and notably lighter. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11 version, so it gives you a lot of extra features and increased performance.
Galaxy Z Flip features a much better display than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels, a little bigger display and a lot higher pixels count per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Defy (2021) shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has a much more MP camera in the back, a larger aperture and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Defy (2021) features a much better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.