Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-17 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Motorola Defy (2021), with a 92.3 score against 77.2. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide the user very similar OS features. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is older than Motorola Defy (2021), it's design is notably thinner and noticeably lighter.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a little bigger screen, a much higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2636px. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a greater memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola Defy (2021) has a much longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Defy (2021) features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has a bigger camera aperture, a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.