Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0.4, 2.3.5 | -- |
| 2012-01-09 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.00 x 2.65 x 0.50 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 255.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 275 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1785mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 204 hours standby time 12.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is a lot better than Motorola Droid 4's 62 global score. The LG Velvet is a a lot newer and noticeably thinner cellphone than the Motorola Droid 4, although it is just a little bit heavier. LG Velvet counts with a bit better looking display than Motorola Droid 4, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a lot bigger screen.
The LG Velvet counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Motorola Droid 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet features a faster CPU than Motorola Droid 4, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
LG Velvet counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Droid 4, because it has a way better resolution back camera, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way bigger aperture for better low-light photography and video. The LG Velvet counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola Droid 4, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
The LG Velvet is a little more expensive than the Motorola Droid 4, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.