Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.2 | 65.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0.4, 2.3.4 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2011-09-07 | 2016-11-11 |
| 5.02 x 2.63 x 0.43 inches | 5.51 x 2.77 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.60 ounces | 4.64 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 165.00 | $ 104.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 256 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 7.65 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1735mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3120mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 10.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi 4a is just a bit better than the Motorola Droid Bionic, having a 65.8 score against 60.2. The Xiaomi Redmi 4a is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also way thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Droid Bionic. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi 4a has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola Droid Bionic has Android 4.1.2 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Motorola Droid Bionic has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi 4a, although it has a little smaller screen, a little bit worse pixel density and a way worse resolution of 960 x 540px. Xiaomi Redmi 4a has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Droid Bionic, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi 4a features a much better camera than Motorola Droid Bionic, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi 4a also has a much bigger aperture for better photos in poorly lited situations and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4a features a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Bionic, and although they both have the same 16 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi 4a also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 128 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi 4a counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola Droid Bionic, because it has a 3120mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Xiaomi Redmi 4a is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.