Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-09-05 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.19 x 2.67 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2530mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 286 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is much better than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, having a overall score of 80.2 against 64.6. Google Pixel's construction is noticeably newer and just a little bit lighter, but also just a bit thicker than the Motorola DROID RAZR HD. Google Pixel features a bit better processing power than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and faster).
Google Pixel counts with a display that's very similar to the Motorola DROID RAZR HD one, although the Google Pixel also has a quite bigger screen, a better pixels number in each display inch and a way better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution. The Google Pixel features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel has a little longer battery performance than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because it has 2770mAh of battery capacity against 2530mAh. The Google Pixel takes way better videos and photos than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because it has a bigger aperture, a back camera with a way better 12.3 MP resolution and a way better video definition.
Google Pixel not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola DROID RAZR HD.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.