Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.6 | 70.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-09-05 | 2019-11-05 |
| 5.19 x 2.67 x 0.33 inches | 9.73 x 5.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 17.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 240.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.26 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2530mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 286 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG G Pad 5 has a score of 70.8, which is a bit better than the Motorola DROID RAZR HD's overall score of 64.6. Although LG G Pad 5 is much heavier than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, it's just a bit thinner and also extremely newer. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but LG G Pad 5 has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola DROID RAZR HD has Android 4.4.2 version, so it gives you some extra features and enhanced performance.
The LG G Pad 5 has a little better hardware performance than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and faster) and 3 GB more RAM. The Motorola DROID RAZR HD has a better display than LG G Pad 5, because although it has a much smaller display and a lot worse 1280 x 720px resolution, it also counts with a greater pixels density.
LG G Pad 5 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID RAZR HD. Both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the same video frame rates and a same resolution back-facing camera. The LG G Pad 5 counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage.
LG G Pad 5 features a way better battery performance than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because it has a 224 percent greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG G Pad 5 is also very cheap compared to the other devices, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.