Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.6 | 71.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android |
| 2012-09-05 | 2019-09-26 |
| 5.19 x 2.67 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Forest green, Mineral grey and Pearl white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 239.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Helio G90T chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali G76 MC4 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 20.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 3.41 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2530mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 286 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro is much better than the Motorola DROID RAZR HD, with a score of 71.1 against 64.6. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro has Android operating system, and Motorola DROID RAZR HD works with Android 4.4.2 operating system. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro's construction is way newer than Motorola DROID RAZR HD's, although it is incredibly heavier and just a little thicker.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a really larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB and 48 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola DROID RAZR HD captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro, although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rates.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.