Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-09-05 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.19 x 2.67 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2530mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 286 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is a lot better than the Motorola DROID RAZR HD's overall score of 64.6. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro design is a lot newer, but just a little bit thicker and heavier than Motorola DROID RAZR HD. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while Motorola DROID RAZR HD has Android 4.4.2.
Motorola DROID RAZR HD has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a way lower 1280 x 720 resolution, a bit less pixels per inch of display and a much smaller screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior camera than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a lot bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a way better resolution camera in the back. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better memory for games and applications than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB and 48 GB more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because it has a 98% greater battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.